 |
Homosexuality
and the Uniting Church
from Robert Bos
The issue
of sexuality has been widely discussed in the Uniting Church at
least since 1981. We have many documents and resolutions about it.
Much prayerful Biblical and theological study has been done. I think
it is important if we want to take a strong stand, and seek to persuade
the councils of the church of the rightness of our stand, that we
honour the reflection that has been done and are fully conversant
with it - otherwise we risk relying on half-truths, a few slogans
and the arguments of those who simply confirm our thoughts, rather
than those who stretch our thinking.
I am not
sure why this one area of Christian discipleship has attracted such
a huge amount of discussion and passion. Personally, I feel called
to minister in other areas. Nevertheless, for what it is worth,
I set down where I am at present in the fond hope that it may be
helpful to others.
There is
no restriction on the circulation of this. It may be freely copied
and used as a basis for respectful discussion. I would, however,
ask that it be quoted fairly and not selectively with particular
bits taken out of context. I would therefore ask that it be kept
intact.
- I believe that sex is a gift from God and, sexuality rightly
expressed, is a blessing from God. As with anything else in
life, it needs to be expressed in a way that is consistent with
the will of God. It can be a source of great joy, but also of
tremendous pain. We are answerable to God for the way we express
our sexuality as much as anything else.
- Christians
have the responsibility to show a radically different attitude
to sexuality from that portrayed in many movies, videos and
many other media. Much of this is degrading and exploitative
of women and sometimes of children. These almost invariably
fail to recognise that sexuality is God's gift and that life
is to be lived in a way which worships, reverences and respects
God. "It is my body and I'll do with it as I please"
is inconsistent with any Christian understanding. In a society
where almost anything goes, and sexual abuse causes untold suffering,
to live by clear and consistent standards of sexual ethics is
an important part of our witness.
- Instances
of sexual abuse by ministers, priests and other agents of the
church have been widely publicised and roundly (and rightly)
condemned in the wider society. The Christian church has much
to repent of. This has seriously compromised the church's witness.
In the eyes of many, we have lost the right to speak in the
public arena about this issue. It is important that we get our
own house in order.
- The Uniting
Church has procedures in place to ensure Congregations are child
safe communities. We also have a strong statement on marriage.
The Code of Ethics is a key resource. We also have comprehensive
procedures to dealing with complaints of sexual misconduct.
It is vital that these be adhered to and upheld. These resources
are in place and any further reflection must be seen alongside
these. The statements on homosexuality and, in particular, the
statement on "right relationships" should not be read
in isolation from these.
- "Celibacy
in singleness and faithfulness in marriage" is a very useful
guide. It is clear and simple. I strive to live by it and urge
others to live by it. It is what I taught my children.
- "Celibacy
in singleness and faithfulness in marriage" is, however,
not enough. It is not good enough for a Christian to say he
or she is sexually faithful to their spouse and then to treat
their spouse appallingly.
- We therefore
also need some statement about the quality of Christian relationship.
Such a statement should probably include something about honesty,
respect, trust, faithfulness, equality and mutuality, vulnerability,
freedom and responsibility, self control, affection, communication
and intimacy. These need to be expressions of Christian love
(agape) - the most central value in any Christian ethic. Most
of these are helpfully spelled out in the document Uniting Sexuality
and Faith and are discussed under the heading of "right
relationships". "Right relationships" is therefore
not a slogan, but rather a reference to a detailed statement
which deserves to be considered in full. Some people have come
to regard "right relationships" as some sort of licence
for loose sexual ethics. This is clearly a mischievous, dishonest
and unfair distortion.
- To say
that sexual ethics needs to be based on "right relationships"
is also a very useful guide, but again, for many people it may
not be enough. They prefer (or are only capable of comprehending)
clear, simple rules to seeing a more complex picture of the
structure of Christian character. For many the comprehensive
statement about right relationships does not give clear enough
guidance in itself. We humans are good at fooling ourselves
and rationalising. Furthermore, the whole statement regarding
"right relationships" may not say enough to the young
who do not have sufficient life experience to make sober decisions
(and whose hormones are hyperactive!) Personally, I see it as
a very much more demanding ethic than simply "celibacy
in singleness and faithfulness in marriage". Just as Jesus
wanted people to go beyond the simple prescriptions of the law
to the heart of the matter (Matthew 5:21-48), so the more detailed
statement in Uniting Sexuality and Faith takes us beyond a simple
legalism to genuine expressions of Christian love.
- I am sad
that the current debate in the Uniting Church has been characterised
as being between those who support "celibacy in singleness
and faithfulness in marriage" in one camp and those who
support "right relationships" in the other camp. I
do not see them as "mutually exclusive" positions.
I believe both positions have their place and they strengthen
each other.
- We are
all sinners and completely dependent on the grace and mercy
of God in Jesus Christ. Most of us have probably committed sexual
sins (cf Matt 5:27-30). We should not think we are the righteous
and better than others and then look down on others as sinful.
Christ welcomes all. Jesus said it is not the well who need
a doctor but the sick. God welcomes sinners home. God's grace
is for all and is unconditional.
- Once we
accept God's free grace, the Holy Spirit begins to transform
every area of our lives to become more Christ-like. That is
a life-long journey. Not many of us would therefore claim to
be completely mature in Christ yet. No doubt there is much the
Spirit wants and needs to do in our lives. This should make
us wary of being too self-righteous about the specks of dust
we see in the lives of others (Matt. 7:3).
- While our
society is obsessed with sex, we need to guard against being
obsessed with it ourselves. If we are to be "obsessed"
with anything, it is God and God's will. Sexual ethics is only
one area God wants to transform. Others include how we talk
(especially about others), the use of money, the use of our
time and many others. The New Testament probably has more to
say about some of these things than about sexuality. There is
nothing in Scripture to suggest that sexual sins are any worse
than other sins.
- It is inappropriate
to stigmatise particular groups of people. Just as Peter had
to be converted from such an attitude (Acts 10), so do we.
- There are
some Christians who are homosexual by orientation. They did
not choose this; they were made this way. Questions about the
causes of homosexuality are not theological matters; they are
best left to the biologists and social scientists. It is possible
that a few may well have been transformed from their homosexual
orientation by the healing grace of God. Others have not been
changed but choose to live celibate lives. I respect them and
thank God for them.
- There are
some Christians who are homosexual by natural orientation who
subscribe to "celibacy in singleness and faithfulness in
marriage" and the importance of Christ-like relationships
and would like to be married to a partner of the same sex. But
neither Australian society nor the church will allow that. They
have searched the scriptures and wrestled in prayer and, consequently,
have entered a loving and mutually supportive relationship with
a person of the same sex. They feel loved and accepted by God,
but often feel condemned by other Christians. Some of them demonstrate
the fruit of the Spirit to a high degree. I have agonised with
some of these people. I am not in their shoes. I neither endorse
their decision, nor condemn it - that is not my place. I value
their friendship, and love and support them. I recognise that
sincere Christians often make different decisions about what
career they follow, whether to drink alcohol or not, which political
party to vote for, how to spend their money and a host of other
issues. It is important that Christians continue to dialogue
as, together, we seek God's will.
- I do personally
know some (women) ministers who are in close long-lasting friendships
with people of the same gender. I do not know if they are actively
sexually. (I do not ask them about their sex lives, just as
I do not ask my heterosexual friends about their sex lives.)
I do know that they are among the most highly effective Ministers
I know and the Holy Spirit has blessed these ministries. Given
this evidence, along with the fact that detailed and responsible
exegetical studies of the scriptures arrive at different conclusions,
I do not want to say that they should be prevented or excluded
from ministry. If we had been able to come to clear united understandings
of what scripture and tradition say, it would be much more straight-forward.
If there are obvious victims, then it would also be much simpler.
Unfortunately, as with some other areas where Christians have
not come to a common mind (but about which we get much less
passionate), it is messy.
- Some have
kept on asserting that Scripture and tradition have been clear
and unambiguous on the issue of homosexuality for 2,000 years.
The more I read, the less strongly do I want to assert that.
The Biblical and historical record is not totally one-sided.
The Uniting Church considered the biblical evidence carefully
in 1985. We have not yet carefully studied the historical record.
It would be nice if it were all simple, but it is not.
- Furthermore,
there have been previous instances when the Spirit has led the
church into new truth. The struggles recorded in the book of
Acts about circumcision is one. In spite of the fact that circumcision
had been the central sign of the covenant, that Jesus was circumcised
and that Jesus had said nothing to indicate that it was no longer
required, the early church decided it should not be required.
Slavery is not condemned in Scripture. It took the church seventeen
hundred years to realise it was inconsistent with the spirit
of Christ. There are verses in Paul's writings which forbid
women to speak in church. In spite of that, we believe the Spirit
led us, in the twentieth century, to ordain women. More recently
we have considered the relevance of the gospel for the international
economic order and power politics. A former theological teacher
of mine liked to speak about the "time-bombs" in the
gospel - implications which we realise only much later. This
has helped me to be open to further time-bombs in the gospel.
- I am hesitant
about the Councils of the church laying down rules about issues
which affect other Christians deeply, but with which we have
not had to wrestle personally and about which the church (ecumenically)
has not achieved a common mind. It is usually unhelpful to deal
with matters of relationships by making rules. Such matters
are best left in the area of pastoral conversation. In the case
of those for whom it is appropriate, this is best left to Presbyteries
and their Pastoral Relations Committees.
- I am not
saying, of course, that the church should tolerate sin. Sin
maims, oppresses and destroys. It should be clearly named and
exposed. The question we are trying to determine here as a church
is, "Is homosexuality, when expressed between two loving,
consenting adults in a permanent relationship, a sin?"
If we begin with the assumption that homosexuality is a sin,
then we cannot ever begin to have the discussion.
- It is not
the Assembly's role to interfere in the right of Presbyteries
to undertake prayerful and responsible discernment about the
selection of candidates and the placement of Ministers and others.
There are many who would like the Assembly to interfere in the
responsibilities of other Councils when it suits them. The Basis
of Union, Constitution and Regulations are quite clear. We are
committed to "inter-related Councils". The Presbytery
is a Council with its own rights and responsibilities through
which we seek to discern the will of God.
- There are
some who think the church should be a democracy and that controversial
issues should be decided by plebiscite. The church is not a
democracy and is not governed by majority votes. The church
strives to be a theocracy (ruled by God) and is governed by
Councils (Church Council, Presbytery, Synod and Assembly) who
aim to discern the guidance of the Spirit.
I will continue
to pray, read and reflect. My concern is that so much of our energy
and passion is being consumed by this one issue, and our unity is
threatened, when there are so many needs, and so much pain, both
within the church and the wider society. There are many areas where
there are obvious victims. We have a Gospel to proclaim which brings
new life, hope and joy. This is where I feel called to minister.
I want to get back to God's work.
Robert Bos
5 September 2003
|
 |